Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gianmarco Ferrari vs Filip Bergevi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ferrari vs Bergevi analysis and find out who is favored!
Gianmarco Ferrari vs Filip Bergevi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ferrari 1 - 0 Bergevi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ferrari has won 45.99% of points on his second serve, while Bergevi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ferrari, in recent form, has won 51.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bergevi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.28% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ferrari has saved 59.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bergevi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ferrari has won 47.46% of matches played (W/L 28/ 31), with Bergevi winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ferrari has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 110/ 91), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 10/ 16). Bergevi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 53/ 44), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 22/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Ferrari has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.71% of matches (W/L 16/ 19), where as Bergevi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ferrari winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ferrari winning 2 and Bergevi winning 0. The last match between Ferrari and Bergevi was at the M25 Casinalbo, 05-07-2021, First, Clay with Gianmarco Ferrari getting the victory 6-1 7-6(2).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ferrari and Bergevi have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ferrari winning 0 times and Bergevi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ferrari winning 1, and Bergevi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ferrari has played against opponents with an average rank of 258.83 while Bergevi has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ferrari has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bergevi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ferrari has converted 43.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bergevi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
571
Rank
387
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
900
Rank
568
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
52% (131-122)
Career Total W/L
54% (157-134)
43% (10-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,280
Career Prize Money
$1,445
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gianmarco Ferrari | Filip Bergevi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:0 | 1:43:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (37/62) | 56% (36/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (30/37) | 58% (21/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (12/25) | 43% (12/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (31/64) | 32% (20/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Filip Bergevi
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gianmarco Ferrari | Filip Bergevi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (10/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (26/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (275/288) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 74 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:25 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 276.48 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1188/1886) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (777/1188) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (321/698) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (81/186) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (718/1819) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 45% (9/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (10/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 35% (17/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Gianmarco Ferrari Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mateus Alves
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
65%
(
70 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
92)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
57
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Raphael Calzi
44%
(
28 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Bautista Otegui
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
71%
(
72 of
102)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
82%
(
69 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
74 of
111)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
13%
(
2 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Valerio Perruzza
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
62
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
67%
(
74 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
61 of
111)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
54%
(
59 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
111)
109
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Filip Bergevi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcelo Zormann
Player
Filip Bergevi
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
101)
5
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
36 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Dahlin
Player
Filip Bergevi
58%
(
62 of
106)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(4) 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Bergevi
Player
Alejandro Hoyos
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Bergevi
Player
Saba George Nanobashvili
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Filip Bergevi
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Filip Bergevi
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
22 of
27)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gian Marco Moroni
Player
Filip Bergevi
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Filip Bergevi
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
11
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Filip Bergevi
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Filip Bergevi
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ferrari Vs Bergevi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Gianmarco Ferrari
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
